CSUS professor Gwen Amos’ “Visual Image” students have a tough assignment: research and understand the scope of poverty in Sacramento, and develop a print piece, poster and campaign to assist a worthy nonprofit. Today I met with four students — Biz Lemma, Charmian Mendoza, Jessica Ripley and Kevin Swaim — to discuss their preliminary ideas to benefit Women’s Empowerment, an organization that they see has having a vital mission and approach to helping homeless women. (Note: their work is not sponsored by Women’s Empowerment but they selected the organization and are busily working on ideas to advance its cause.)
They also came with a laundry list of questions – 20, to be exact! More than a dozen were of general interest so I’ll do my best to answer them here. Readers, do you disagree with me? Please comment. I know the students would appreciate the input.
How can we, as designers, use social marketing strategies to influence the behaviors of the public?
How can’t you? I know that’s not what you asked. Social marketing literally means influencing attitudes and behaviors to accomplish a public good. All causes have to “map” how they will get people from point “A” to point “B.” They may have to create awareness first before getting people to take steps that will accomplish the good they envision. Or it may be that people are already aware of the issue and just need to know how they can get involved, usually starting with low-risk baby steps and progressing to higher involvement. Social media, which we discussed today, offers an important set of tools to get people to engage.
What methods have been used in “call to action” campaigns that would work on a local scale?
We discussed a variety of examples when we met, but I’ll share one here. Some of the most successful campaigns address a problem that people immediately grasp, make it easy to support the effort, and have a short-term sense of urgency. “Give to the Max Day” in Minnesota is an effort by that state’s nonprofits to come together and get people to give locally. Last year, the effort raised more than $10 million from 42,000 donors in 24 hours.
What levels of interactivity do we need to reach in order to make an impact? How important is it for the audience to be able to interact with an advertisement as opposed to simply read information on a flyer?
I know from our conversation that you’re wondering whether a poster or flyer (which requires no interaction) is better or worse that some kind of communications tool that makes you take an action (like a tear-off pad). Old school direct mail advertising used to favor pieces where you had to apply a sticker and send in for the free offer. Asking people to do something yielded higher returns than just a plain old mail appeal. But today, it’s important to remember that people have short attention spans. Something tactile might work if it’s clever enough and makes sense, or it might get ignored. Spend time thinking about where people are now in their decision process about involvement. Do you need to spend time raising awareness as a “drip irrigation” method: delivering a steady stream of short messages through passive media like billboards? Or do people already ‘get it’ and just need an easy way to act – like click a button on a website? When it comes to interactivity, I’d think less about print, which has a substantial up front cost and may be risky in terms of return. Think more about online tactics.
For a cause like helping to alleviate poverty, is a magazine the right way to present the information we have?
It could be a way to present it. First you have to reach an audience that wants to know more. Magazines have the luxury of multiple pages to tell the story, and the ability to present compelling visuals. They might be a great tool for major donor prospects. Another approach might be a video.
Do you think that social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) is more successful currently than traditional billboards, print ads, mailers, etc.?
The metric for success here is return on investment. For every dollar you spend, what do you get back? Because social media are cheap or free, it’s hard to beat the return. Plus you can experiment rapidly. On the other hand, the jury is out in terms of social media’s ability to generate substantial donations. As pointed out recently by John Kenyon at the Nonprofit Resource Center conference, email and even “snail mail” still play an important role in generating donations. (Here’s an old presentation of his that explains the role of email in fundraising.) Online donors frequently become snail mail donors.
Is there any gain in having volunteer organizations on Yelp?
Yelp is definitely a social medium, but people tend to go there for reviews. It can be a good place to create events to attract new friends and followers.
Do you feel that QR codes are a fad? Are these marketable to older crowds as well? Are people more likely o get involved with an organization, or at least visit their websites, if there is a QR in the ad?
Old like me :) ? I think they’ll be useful eventually but right now they’re mostly sizzle and no steak for nonprofits. On the other hand, there is a small set of people who love new tech toys, and those people might follow a QR to a website. If you’re trying to recruit programmers to work with disadvantaged kids near Silicon Valley, a QR code on ads might work well. Think about your target audience first. Do they have smart phones and use a QR reader app?
What is a good way to advertise for volunteers as opposed to donations?
Volunteering and donating are both behaviors. As we talked about today, friends are a more influential source of information than paid advertising. Think about how you can mobilize people to bring their friends into a cause, whether it’s as a volunteer or donor. You might think of those as alternative paths for giving. Some people might have more time or talent, while others have more financial resources. Nonprofits need both.
What is a good length for a YouTube video campaign? Would these be effective for groups such as Women’s Empowerment so that the target audience can put a face to the cause?
Watch TV news and you’ll get a pretty good idea about the optimal length of a video. Keep remembering: we all have short attention spans! I haven’t seen data about optimal length but I’d guess 2-3 minutes would be the maximum before you start to lose people. Videos do need a story arc: something that engages you, depicts a struggle or a challenge, and releases tension by providing information about what you can do. Video is ideal for organizations like Women’s Empowerment, much harder for organizations that have “colorless” visuals – e.g. free tax preparation assistance. [Update: The Give Minnesota folks are also running a nonprofit video contest called "Does this make my heart look big?" The second flash image that comes up once you land on the site asks for votes on the most compelling video. Check them out and see what you think about length and impact.]
What sort of information would an organization trying to raise community involvement need to include on a Facebook page? In trying to up the number of volunteers, would Facebook be more successful than traditional print ads or flyers?
What works best – always – is an integrated media campaign across multiple channels, but nonprofits rarely have the money for that. Websites and Facebook are very cost effective channels for engaging people. The beauty of Facebook is engagement and interaction; it’s a conversation rather than a one-way channel. Spend time looking around on Facebook fan pages to see what kind of content (and messages) seem to be working for nonprofits that have similar appeals. Draft a one-page “message and voice” guideline with your ideas about what the nonprofit needs to convey (prioritized) and what its personality should be. The idea is to get other people to post on your page and on their own page. Above is an example from today on River City Food Bank‘s Facebook page – 2 people who cared enough to post.
How many campaigns should an organization have per year?
Whatever number is effective! It would depend on the organization and what it’s asking through the campaigns. The big thing is that the organization should map out a strategy for the year. For example, it might start the year with a personal outreach campaign to major donors, then promote an event, then focus on a membership drive, then do a holiday push and “it’s not too late” New Year’s reminder.
Start with the end in mind (outcome). What is the problem the client — in this case, the nonprofit — is struggling with that marketing and design can help solve?
Conceptualize a strategy that goes from awareness of a problem or cause through the behavior that the nonprofit wants to encourage. You will undoubtedly have a limited budget so pick just one step on the long ladder from awareness to behavior as a place to begin.
Test it on your mother. Can you explain what you want your Mom to do in 140 characters or less so that she gets it and wants to help?
Think in terms of a short campaign – or at least a fairly short experiment. So many of the “old reliable” marketing techniques have fallen by the wayside with splintered audiences. Now everything is test and learn, keep building on what works and stop doing what doesn’t. What can you do that’s not too expensive and gets a response in 6 weeks or less?
Good luck. And thanks. The nonprofit world needs young people like you who care, and have talent to share.